Critical Thinking Toward the Journal
Analysis
Critical Thinking towards the Journal of P2P : Assessing a Peer Evaluation
Strategy, by Ching When Chang, Cathy J.Pearman and Nicholas W. Farha, Missouri
State University and Logan University.
· 1. Examine the evidence/ the argument
presented
In
the background of study the authors’ argument stated that previously research
has shown about active students engagement teaching learning process in the
classroom enhances knowledge acquisition. It can be improving their outcomes
very well (Todd and Hudson, 2007). Thus, the researcher wants to prove that
Peer Evaluation also believed can improve students’ critical thinking and high
outcomes. According to the researcher Peer Evaluation has a number of pedagogical
benefits.
Purpose
of study is to prove that Peer Evaluation is the best strategy to improve
students’ critical thinking and can train themselves how to observe and measure
their peer. Based on the evidence in real life, students are frustrated because
they cannot avoid the mistake while doing their project or assignment. Thus,
the researchers ask them to check their friends project and correct the
mistakes each other, so they can know whether their project well or not.
In
the research question, the researchers want to make sure that whether Peer
Evaluation gives students opportunity to align their own projects with the
rubric. In the other hand the literature review shows many scholars perspective
about Peer Evaluation, according to the literature review Peer Evaluation is
the best process to provide students to learn from their peers and also
involves sharing activity which can lead them in terms of enabling
contextualized professional development. Other scholar also mentioned that Peer
Evaluation also improves student ability to receive constructive feedback.
Based
on this journal the researchers proved that peer evaluation process facilitates
additional opportunities for students to read and apply rubrics, pay more
attention to detailed project requirement, and practice critical thinking
skills as a result of evaluating each peers’ project. This research shows that
more than 90% of the participants agreed this process played an important role
in the enhancement of the quality of their project. because existence of peer
evaluation makes the participants spend time carefully reading rubrics and
comparing them to project task. The statistical analysis indicated that more
that 75 % students believed the feedback peers was helpful, constructive and
professional.
· 2. Check out any influences on the evidence
or argument
Previous
researcher, Todd and Hudson found that Peer Evaluation assignment encouraged
students to think critically, students can synthesize information and write
about course material. this way also improves students’ grade. This previous
study surely influences the evidence or the argument for this article to do
more research. Based on the research findings, there is any influence about
peer assessment. The process of this research required them to take the time to
read the rubric carefully and realize what they had missed on their own project
by paying more attention to the details. Thus, if students use their critical
thinking skills, they will employ peer projects systematically and it could
improve the quality of their project.
· 3. Check out the limitation of the study
design, examine the interpretation mode
In
the limitation of study, the researcher said that peer evaluation is not
comprehensively affective and not necessarily generalize to some educational
environment or population due to the limited sample of this research. According
to the researcher, the research need more additional research to develop the
ideas broadly.
· 4. Decide to what extent you are prepared
to accept the author’s argument, opinion, or conclusion
Based
on the conclusion in the research, I am totally agree about authors’ argument,
Implementing a peer evaluation helped students learn and teach each others.
This method also can increase students’ critical thinking, and provide this
feedback to their peers in a professional manner. They also improved their own
project and gain ideas by reviewing their peers’ project. Peer feedback also
helps teacher to reduce teacher workload, because of the process assessing can
be replaced by the students’ itself.
Komentar
Posting Komentar